• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That didn’t happen.
    And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
    And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
    And if it is, that’s not my fault.
    And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
    And if I did, you deserved it.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    What’s this? Ron DeSantis LIED about something? He was WRONG? Oh my goodness this is big news! The implication that he has ever told the truth in his miserable life needs to be heard! People need to know!

    • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree with this sentiment and I’m not sure what the gotcha is ?

      We know we are living in the post truth era, so our default position should be - this is post truth political rhetoric .

    • Treczoks@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Those people who would need to know this most are the ones least to listen and comprehend.

  • TBi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    He’s technically correct. They didn’t argue, they just demanded and expected everyone else to accept it. There was no discussion…

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is the technicality they run on. Find any minute rhetorical shift, and claim it didn’t happen under that shift - then let the cattle defend the sound bite or quote.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Or they just lie with wild abandon and sometimes they accidentally say something that’s technically true.

        • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I frequently run into sealioning types who like to purposefully misunderstand phrases/terms used so they can ‘win’.

          You’re right though it’s often just pasta on the wall, rapid-fire type nonsense.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            We call that “false equivalence,” more formally. It’s no wonder there’s an intersection of Christian fundamentalism and right-wing politics, because that is a favorite tactic of religious apologists, too (who are often fundamentalists themselves).

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hold tf on. So what happens when someone gets an abortion in a place where it’s illegal? There are places making illegal for pregnant women to use highways to stop them from traveling to other states. I know these aren’t just fines.

    • gkd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well the new speaker praised the bill that would have jailed women who get an abortion for 1-10 years. So…that is the direction they want to take it. But that’s not a surprise.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      previously, abortion laws prevented doctors from performing them.

      Women simply couldn’t get their health providers to give them one. I’m not sure what would have happened if they went with the ol’ rusty coathanger route. (remember folks, banning abortions doesn’t actually stop abortions. It just makes them substantially less safe.)

      In any case, what they’re now trying to do is, lock women up who go get otherwise legal abortions out of state. For their next trick, they’ll bar women from having freedom of travel. so they can’t escape.

      • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        But that’s what I’m saying. Those are already laws in places like Texas. So why does the article/Snopes mention that putting women in prison isn’t a thing they say? Is a semantical issue that not ALL of them say it?

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The article blantantly says desantis is wrong.

          It’s desantis whose saying no one is arguing for jail time. not cnn or snopes.

          • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            "DeSantis could have fairly said that the most prominent US anti-abortion groups have expressed opposition to the idea of jailing women for getting an abortion. "

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              which is more or less true. mainstream anti-abortion advocates still want to appear “reasonable”

              they’re still trying to avoid saying the quiet part out loud. It’s only the far right christofascists that are openly saying they want to lock women up for an abortion. every one else is smart enough to keep their mouth shut.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    The section in question is focused on physicians, and DeSantis argued that reading the law makes it clear that the criminal penalties apply only to medical practitioners

    What a complete and utter lack of responsibility. “I didn’t cause that village to die of thirst, I just shut the dam completely so no water could get to them.”

    Actions have consequences. Actions cause reaction. Either he is too dumb to put those two pieces together, or being directly misleading.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      He knows what he’s doing. When dealing with Republicans, never assume incompetence when malice is a potential explanation.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nolnah’s Conservative Razor

        Also, I’d change that to “when malice is an adequate explanation.”

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      He knows what he’s doing. I get the sense that he’s naturally authoritarian, but if he though Bernie’s politics would get him elected, he adopt Bernie’s politics.

      He’s basically just an empty vessel. A naturally evil empty vessel. Which is perfect for the GOP.

  • oDDmON@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lying liars and the lies they tell.

    If we only published the truths they told, we’d hear nary a whisper from them most of the time.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can’t wait for the, well I was just ignorant of the subject matter I talk so authoritatively about, when challenged on the lie. Will he go with he is a liar or ignorant.

      • kase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        IIRC, there was a story recently about him having a young dude kicked out for asking a question. I might be thinking of the wrong thing lol

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    If a conservative speaks- it’s automatically a false claim.

  • rusfairfax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Guy is just a bad candidate. Whether it’s a lie or a screw up, who cares - he’s just not good. And this is the best alternative to Trump that the Republicans can produce. Vomit.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would argue that he is even worse because he cares about politics and social issues whereas Donald Trump only cared about himself. DeSantis could actually do some irreversible damage.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That would actually be Asa Hutchinson. DeSantis should be in prison for his human trafficking & kidnapping conspiracy.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wasn’t there literally a story recently about a woman who was suspected of endangering her unborn child, not even actually going to get an abortion which was illegal in the state of Tennessee at the time, the time being 2023…

    But just suspected, and that alone was enough to get her a jail sentence where she nearly lost the child giving birth to them in a prison shower with no medical staff on standby of any kind.