• 4 Posts
  • 3.08K Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • frezik@midwest.socialtohmmm@lemmy.worldhmmm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    See, I watch Adam Something videos from the point of view that he’s not really talking about America. He’s talking about European politicians looking at terrible ideas from America and trying to replicate them.

    This is a pretty good example. America wouldn’t do this, exactly, but it’s a step towards our terrible bike infrastructure. The other poster had the right of it: in America, the sign wouldn’t be there at all, but the intersection would still be badly designed.






  • frezik@midwest.socialtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldOh Joe...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    First Past the Post doesn’t guarantee complete nationwide hegemony of two parties. There can be areas where the vote is between a mainstream party and a regional party, because the other mainstream party doesn’t show up. This happens in the UK all the time.

    They don’t take a lot, but those seats are enough that the big parties often have to work with them to cobble together a majority.

    Nor is First Past the Post the only factor. There’s plenty of southern states that have runoff voting. Their last century of state level offices are just as filled with Democrats and Republicans as anywhere else.

    The US is unique in that not only are their only two real parties, but those two parties dominate at every level of government.


  • No way they’re replacing the bigger ones, like the Moskva. That one was built in a yard that’s now in Ukraine, and Russia hasn’t gotten that part back. Even if they did, Ukraine hadn’t really maintained it.

    It was also launched in 1979, and they haven’t built anything that size since the USSR fell.

    They’d have to rebuild the infrastructure needed to build the ship. These losses are irreplaceable.





  • Nuclear is nothing bog standard. If it was, it wouldn’t take 10 years. Almost every plant is a boutique job that requires lots of specialists. The Westinghouse AP1000 reactor design was meant to get around this. It didn’t.

    The experts can stay where they are: maintaining existing nuclear power.

    Renewables don’t take much skilled labor at all. It’s putting solar panels on racks in a field, or hoisting wind blades up a tower (crane operation is a specialty, but not on the level of nuclear engineering).


  • Then we just move the problem. Why should we do something that’s going to take longer and use more labor? Especially skilled labor.

    Money is an imperfect proxy for the underlying resources in many ways, but it about lines up in this case. To force the issue, there would have to be a compelling reason beyond straight money.

    That reason ain’t getting to 100% clean energy in a short time. There is another: building plants to use up existing waste rather than burying it.





  • No, you just pay out the nose up front.

    If I had money to invest in the energy sector, I don’t know why I should pick nuclear. It’s going to double its budget and take 10 years before I see a dime of return. Possibly none if it can’t secure funding for the budget overrun, as all my initial investment will be spent.

    A solar or wind farm will take 6-12 months and likely come in at or close to its budget. Why the hell would I choose nuclear?




  • Not sure about GP, but that’s basically what we did under “SAFe” (Scaled Agile Framework). PI planning means taking most of a sprint to plan everything for the next quarter or so. It’s like a whole week of ticket refinement meetings. Or perhaps 3 days, but when you’ve had 3 days of ticket refinement meetings, it might as well be the whole work week for as much a stuff as you’re going to get done otherwise.

    It’s as horrible as you’re thinking, and after a lot of agitating, we stopped doing that shit.