• knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    But it’s fine that Red Hat/IBM is literally a US defense contractor that knowingly participates in crimes against humanity.

    Plus the other thousand examples of how Linux, or any western tech, are the product of empire.

  • kredditacc@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    One sane voice amongst the madness:

    I’m pretty sure everyone from Israel is still allowed. Double moral of the west, once again.

    I’m worried. Israel has a history of compromising public goods to be used as weapons of war yet they are not banned. Let us hope that other nations of merit (such as China) can audit the code committed to the kernel for their own goods and for ours.

    • KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It accomplishes people moving out of Linux to open and anti-imperialist software.

      Does anyone know of alternatives or if the people going out, and others, intend to fork it?

        • multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Linux is used/developed by NATO, DoD, intel/Israel, Mossad, Google and other imperialist entities. There’s most likely NSA/CIA/Mossad backdoors in the kernel. They’re probably not collecting data from every Linux user, but I am sure that if they wanted to, they could gain access to a Linux/android box.

          This is why you shouldn’t do anything “sensitiv” on your computer. Use full disk encryption if you can, otherwise Tails booted off of a USB stick on public wifi.

          • KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            What the imperialist entities have put in linux until now, or the vulnerabilities they found but didn’t disclose to anyone, isn’t even as much of a problem as what they will likely do now that they are removing the people most likely to be against allowing linux to be used against its users.

  • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    McCarthy would be proud to see his legacy alive and well.

    I can’t say I am surprised, but a bit disappointed.

  • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I saw that earlier and was going to post it here when I got back to my computer. Absolutely depressing. But if the comments at Phoronix were anything to go by, this isn’t going over well. Hopefully sanity will prevail.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    it always gives me pause to see well known kernel maintainers take such seemingly knee jerk reactions.

    when a someone like a script kiddie does it, it doesn’t matter; but I wonder when a kernel maintainer does it, i have to wonder why and i think i’m afraid to learn that the impetus and thought process for both are the same.

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Something i have learned in life, much to my own dismay, is that a lot of people that are very smart, and very good at specific things are really insanely reactionary. I think it comes from them spending so much time on that one thing that they just kind of dont even put any brain power towards politics or the state of the world and just catch some CNN here and there and go ok ya thats 100% true time to get back to arguing about boot loaders or whatever.

      Like i bet the people who made this decision are rn thinking to themselves “Wait im confused the news said Russia was bad and my close circle of lib friends thought this was a good idea why is everyone mad?”

      • SugandeseDelegation@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This has been 100% my experience as well. Most of the really good coders I’ve met are the types that also do it as a hobby outside work and also are reactionary/turbolib empire bootlickers. Literally regurgitating MSM slop and thinking they understand societal problems because they’ve read an op-ed in Bloomberg about why we need AI to fix the economy rather or something like that.

        I think it comes from them spending so much time on that one thing that they just kind of dont even put any brain power towards politics or the state of the world

        I’d also add to that the fact that this one thing they focus on has often been put on a pedestal (like coding for instance), which gets to many of them and makes them overestimate their abilities in other areas (“society says coders are smart, I’m a coder, I make good money, maybe I really am better than others, even at other things too” - an attitude I’ve encountered quite a few times).

        • JucheStalin@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          100% agreed. Most software engineers are awful in this respect.

          I’ve heard one fun thing is being a software engineer with multiple jobs at the same time, barely doing any work, and mostly just studying political theory and using the extra funds to fund local projects organized by their local communist party. A … um … friend of mine does something like that.

      • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Programmers, the senior ones who can court good money with relative ease at least, are gonna tend to be pretty well off, which I’m sure is part of it. For them, the concept of “skills gud, pay gud too, something something meritocracy vibes” pretty much applies (even if the reasons it works for them are probably not what they think) and afaik they don’t even have to fight for it with unions much of the time because the demand is high enough and the number of people at their skill level low enough. Entry level seems to be a much different story, having become saturated with all the bootcamp code stuff and “learn to code” rhetoric and such. But like, there’s stuff where it runs on some old programming language that virtually nobody learns or actively uses anymore, so knowing it could give you a lot of leverage.

        The moment these types of people were faced with hardship in employment and wages, I’m confident many of them would start questioning a lot of things they never thought much about before. But as long as they are a relatively comfy class in high demand, much of the class struggle can fly under the radar for them and through that, much of the rhetoric that might persuade them to think about imperialism as well.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yup. It’s haute labor aristocracy. Or was, maybe it’s down a peg nowadays. And usually all STEM, no humanities. No class consciousness. Petit bourgeois stock options aspirations.

          By all rights I should be an insufferable turbolib.

          The treats are eroding nowadays, though, so they’re likely to get angrier. Maybe a few will develop class consciousness.

          • SugandeseDelegation@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Maybe a few will develop class consciousness.

            Most of these types I interact with are blaming the poor or some specific government “bad apples”. A few do seem to almost “get it”, but still have way too many liberal brainworms and draw some milquetoast or outright reactionary conclusions

            It’s an uphill battle trying to instill any sort of class consciousness in these people, as expected due to their material conditions