Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
The legend is that a foot is actually based of the length of King Henry I’s foot. “Imagine two neighbouring farmers, one buying a field from another, one with huge feet, one with tiny. Each measures the field in feet, but one says the footage is less because he’s got a bigger footprint, and therefore he argues a lower price. It’s a recipe for a mighty mediaeval punchup. So Henry proffered his own royal foot, it’s said. Thus, a foot became 12 inches.”
This is absurd. King Henry I didn’t paint his toenails.
I appreciate a good historical joke.
Me too but I lack knowledge in history. Care to explain it to me?
The legend is that a foot is actually based of the length of King Henry I’s foot. “Imagine two neighbouring farmers, one buying a field from another, one with huge feet, one with tiny. Each measures the field in feet, but one says the footage is less because he’s got a bigger footprint, and therefore he argues a lower price. It’s a recipe for a mighty mediaeval punchup. So Henry proffered his own royal foot, it’s said. Thus, a foot became 12 inches.”
You know what they say about foot size.
(You’re welcome in advance, whoever I set this up for.)
It determines how easy it is for you to find fitting shoes
This is exactly what I was hoping for! Thanks!
TIL