Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Fair enough. I mistakenly took it as rhetorical. Definitionally both sides benefit from bilateral relations, but in the case of state actors that isn’t especially revealing on its own.
What a bizarre non-statement. Please, enlighten us, who?
Questions are usually non-statements. How could I enlighten you when I need to ask the question myself?
Fair enough. I mistakenly took it as rhetorical. Definitionally both sides benefit from bilateral relations, but in the case of state actors that isn’t especially revealing on its own.