• samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Oh yeah, totally forgot that. In that case, it’s even more puzzling that he would claim the child inherited more “seed” from one parent than the other based on their apperance.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think his idea includes things like “if the kid looks like the maternal grandfather, more contribution was from the mother’s seed than the father’s.”

      Not that it’s exclusively that the contributions are only dependent on how closely matching the appearance of the mother or father and only the mother or father.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        But sometimes a kid can look more like their mother, and that kid’s kid can look more like their paternal grandfather. How would he explain that?

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          That the kid’s kid got more of the dad’s seed in the “shifting lottery.”

          It’s not like he’s saying a kid that looks like the mother isn’t getting any contribution from the father.

          And while he’s technically wrong in the idea that there’s a disproportionate overall contribution from each parent, it is true that genes and traits responsible for physical appearance can be disproportionately passed on.