By giving the President the power to ban websites, not just apps, it opens up a whole new can of worms.

Instead of targeting foreign adversaries directly, the law holds US (or offshore) internet hosting services and app stores responsible for any breaches in security or privacy.

This is a Trojan horse that could lead to censorship and control over what people access online.

  • TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml
    28·
    7 months ago

    There’s no way this gets past the senate, right? Right?!

    For real though, just an updated PATRIOT act for the internet, and clearly a response to mass spread of effective working class/pro-Palestine propaganda. Can’t have the slaves seeing other slave rebellions!

    • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
      13·
      7 months ago

      It is actually more likely it gets past the Senate than the Congress. The Senate has always been the more reactionary body and the more dependable one for the neocon imperialist deep state to rely on to advance their agenda.

      We already have laws like this in Europe, I think it would be very naive to believe that America is so exceptional that it won’t happen there.

  • relay@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    22·
    7 months ago

    Could the government ban this site or any of the fediverse sites if they feel like it with this language?

  • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    14·
    7 months ago

    Hard agree except for the ‘sneaky’ bit.

    Anyone following these events can see what it’s really about; the ones that deny it are feigning stupidity.

  • bobs_guns@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    152·
    7 months ago

    Could this actually be a big deal for AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure? This might cause an economic crash accompanied by hundreds of thousands more layoffs if they decided to enforce it against US big tech companies.

    • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
      32·
      7 months ago

      They will not use this against their masters. They will use this to serve them. Shut down competition and control the narrative to serve capitalism.

      • TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml
        12·
        7 months ago

        Real lol it would get shot down the moment it actually threatened any of their daddy donors’ profits, or they just wouldn’t even propose it

        This is the only reason I think they might not pass it, but if they twist it just enough to serve their masters like y’all said…

    • TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml
      9·
      7 months ago

      That’s kind of what I was thinking too like, great TikTok is the scapegoat and China bad blah blah but what about the rest of the internet 💀

      Like others said I think they’ll find some kind of loophole or way to apply it only to their “adversary” industries and twist it to be able to serve their own donors. If it even gets passed

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
        14·
        7 months ago

        This kind of stuff will absolutely be applied selectively. The whole point of a law like this is to let you shut down sites that are inconvenient.

  • supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml
    6·
    7 months ago

    They really think it’s tiktok that makes people disgusted at the idf’s crimes. I am sure more videos of IDF troops sniffing panties and shooting children to the shittiest EDM music you have ever heard will make the kids like them more.

  • Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
    2·
    7 months ago

    This is like the third time the US government has passed legislation to take control of the internet. Must be a lot of red tape.