• reddwarf@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So no answer then?

    If people in a country want to secede then it is up to the country and its procedures to do so. They can have a vote (not the invaders variant as that does not count) but you will have no guarantee it will happen though.

    Is this going to be a form of 4chan discussion where you will never answer but keep bouncing new questions as a form of discouragement?

    • Nakoichi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So no answer then?

      You still did not answer my question:

      What constitutes - in your eyes- “properly monitored”?

      • reddwarf@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Answered your question clearly. You might not like or understand it but answered it was.

        And I see you have another question. So 4chan style it is for you. For being bad faith poster I will now stop discussing with you as it is painfully obvious what you want to do here.

    • 420blazeit69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If people in a country want to secede then it is up to the country and its procedures to do so.

      Say the occupied Navajo nation (or Hawaii, or Puerto Rico…) wants to formally secede from the U.S. The U.S. says no, and says they can’t even vote on it. What then?

      • reddwarf@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Without specifying a group or situation, they rules and procedures for seceding should be followed. If the process fails to deliver your wanted outcome then you have to abide to the rulings.

        What is not ok is for a foreign body to interfere. Certainly not by invading said country and killing, torturing and whatnot. If secession is successful then that autonomous new country can join whatever other country at their hearts desire. But again, that other country is not to step in and force secession.

        Now what if the plight is of such nature it is not sustainable? The last resort you have is revolution or civil war. Again, not the call of a foreign body to step in and start killing people.

        Invading and starting a war which costs the live of innocent people is not the answer.

    • Nakoichi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They literally asked for protection because they tried to do what you said they should and were met by siege warfare from their own government.