• willyaA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      Quite the opposite of shallow in my opinion.

      • poke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s deep to write someone off as incompatible with you because they lightly use popular acronyms?

        • willyaA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s not deep or shallow. It’s not that they’re incompatible. Especially if we’re just talking hooking up. Long term I don’t want to be texting with someone typing like that.

          • BumbleTumbleGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So… Yeah that’s shallow, since you won’t date someone long term due to you not liking how they text, that’s kinda a shallow thing to judge someone on

          • three@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I love you but you’ve used “lol” one too many times. It’s over.

            bitch you shallow

            • willyaA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              How do you get to I love you before realizing you’re dating a 12 year old? lol is fine. I’m talking about many of the other acronyms. wbu alone is a “dumbass can’t think of dog shit to progress the conversation” acronym. It’s low effort. Not worth anyone’s time in the sea of other DMs.