• willyaA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    Quite the opposite of shallow in my opinion.

    • poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s deep to write someone off as incompatible with you because they lightly use popular acronyms?

      • willyaA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s not deep or shallow. It’s not that they’re incompatible. Especially if we’re just talking hooking up. Long term I don’t want to be texting with someone typing like that.

        • three@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I love you but you’ve used “lol” one too many times. It’s over.

          bitch you shallow

          • willyaA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            How do you get to I love you before realizing you’re dating a 12 year old? lol is fine. I’m talking about many of the other acronyms. wbu alone is a “dumbass can’t think of dog shit to progress the conversation” acronym. It’s low effort. Not worth anyone’s time in the sea of other DMs.

        • BumbleTumbleGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          So… Yeah that’s shallow, since you won’t date someone long term due to you not liking how they text, that’s kinda a shallow thing to judge someone on