Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
The machine learning models and developments we see these last years called “AI” for some reason, is as big, if not bigger than the IT and internet revolution, and has applications on a broader spectrum than anyone can currently imagine.
Dont get it confused. Downvotes are not a measure of hatred. People up and downvote depending on if they agree, and even that measure does not represent “correctness” of a comment.
Honestly try to ignore upvote scores, people who obsess over them and want to get upvoted are sheep who repeat popular phrases to get internet points
I think the human brain works kind of the opposite of that. Babies are born with a shitload of neural connections, then the connections decrease over a person’s lifetime. ANNs typically do something similar to that while training (many connection weights will be pushed toward zero, having little or no effect).
But yeah, these LLMs are typically trained once, and frozen during use. “Online learning” is a type of training that continually learns, but current online methods typically lead to worse models (ANNs “forget” old things they’ve “learned” when learning new things).
The machine learning models and developments we see these last years called “AI” for some reason, is as big, if not bigger than the IT and internet revolution, and has applications on a broader spectrum than anyone can currently imagine.
This theory is not nearly rare enough to match the image
As you can see I get downvoted and hated for it so
Dont get it confused. Downvotes are not a measure of hatred. People up and downvote depending on if they agree, and even that measure does not represent “correctness” of a comment.
Honestly try to ignore upvote scores, people who obsess over them and want to get upvoted are sheep who repeat popular phrases to get internet points
I am not confused
I am very certain I receive hate for it
It doesn’t help that it’s dumb as shit
That is such a cold take. People say this all the time. Ive literally seen and heard people compare this to the industrial revolution before.
Idiotic to downvote AND hate my opinion in a place where we should post hot takes then say it’s not a hot take. And still nobody agrees.
As you can see, the opposite is true here
IMHO as long as no new random “neurons” form, it’s not AI as in Artificial Intelligence, just “a lot of ifs”
I think the human brain works kind of the opposite of that. Babies are born with a shitload of neural connections, then the connections decrease over a person’s lifetime. ANNs typically do something similar to that while training (many connection weights will be pushed toward zero, having little or no effect).
But yeah, these LLMs are typically trained once, and frozen during use. “Online learning” is a type of training that continually learns, but current online methods typically lead to worse models (ANNs “forget” old things they’ve “learned” when learning new things).