Pretending that there isn’t a spectrum, of governments restricting liberty or expression, isn’t helping anyone.
What part of “laws are just threats of violence made by the predominant socioeconomic ethnic group in a given nation and the cops are basically an occupying army” do we not understand?
I like some laws.
are you anarchist?
In a “dismantle unjust hierarchies” sense, sure, but I think states are inevitable when people make a society.
claims to be an anarchist
“like[s] some laws”
"states are inevitable’
is this Vaush’s account?
that is confusing. that sense can very well be communist. would i be wrong to presume you dont really know what are either of them?
Well “anarchist” can mean a lot of different things depending on the person so I find it more useful to just say what I agree or disagree with.
Exactly, some “anarchists” are just liberals who like to have an edgy/faux-radical flag and symbol (you), while others are communists with ideological differences who are still willing to work with us toward a similar goal.
bro, you are commenting in a community called “moretankie196”, of a marxist-leninist instance whose name is inspired in a soviet city. we do care about concepts and definitions.
you are very welcome to learn, with us, though :D
😂😂😂😂😂😂 most coherent anarchist theory
In that case you’re holding a belief that goes completely against the ideas implied by the label you use. Yes, there’s always variety of thought in all political fields but this one is an outright contradiction.
Also, nice Trevor Moore pic.
“laws”
are you trying to spook me?
Stirnerposting? On Lemmygrad? I never thought I’d see the day.
left unity to make fun of socdems
This could be what revitalizes the western Left