Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
It’s pretty straightforward - if they vote for Trump and Trump gives Israel the go ahead to wipe out all Palestinians then the ones here that voted for that got what they asked for. Pretty simple.
You interjected into a conversation and I asked you to explain yourself, wherein you implied that some people deserve genocide.
When I pointed this out by quoting you and the person you defended, you cursed at me twice.
While I know that responding to you is definitely a waste of time, I am just drawing a contrast for the reader between us. I did not insult you. I quoted you. I did not twist your words-- I asked you to explain yourself and you insulted me.
I’m still not sure what other interpretation I could lend to your argument as you’ve made it quite clear that party affiliation is more important to you than somebody’s status as a human being.
Can you explain what other interpretation there is for the 2nd sentence?
Because, I can only read it as
and “what they ask for” either refers to “ultra-genocide” or “spite”.
It’s pretty straightforward - if they vote for Trump and Trump gives Israel the go ahead to wipe out all Palestinians then the ones here that voted for that got what they asked for. Pretty simple.
and what is “what they asked for”
Fuck you’re dense. What they asked for by voting for Trump was the acceleration of the death of their people.
so, to quote you:
You’re responding to someone saying
and defending that position.
This is a thread asking if the original responder was implying that anyone deserves genocide for any reason.
I don’t care to engage in this unproductive conversation any longer.
You’re being deliberately obtuse and trying to twist my words. A: fuck you, and B: just don’t respond if you don’t want to engage in conversation.
That’s not polite.
I didn’t twist your words.
You interjected into a conversation and I asked you to explain yourself, wherein you implied that some people deserve genocide. When I pointed this out by quoting you and the person you defended, you cursed at me twice.
While I know that responding to you is definitely a waste of time, I am just drawing a contrast for the reader between us. I did not insult you. I quoted you. I did not twist your words-- I asked you to explain yourself and you insulted me.
I’m still not sure what other interpretation I could lend to your argument as you’ve made it quite clear that party affiliation is more important to you than somebody’s status as a human being.