Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
You interjected into a conversation and I asked you to explain yourself, wherein you implied that some people deserve genocide.
When I pointed this out by quoting you and the person you defended, you cursed at me twice.
While I know that responding to you is definitely a waste of time, I am just drawing a contrast for the reader between us. I did not insult you. I quoted you. I did not twist your words-- I asked you to explain yourself and you insulted me.
I’m still not sure what other interpretation I could lend to your argument as you’ve made it quite clear that party affiliation is more important to you than somebody’s status as a human being.
so, to quote you:
You’re responding to someone saying
and defending that position.
This is a thread asking if the original responder was implying that anyone deserves genocide for any reason.
I don’t care to engage in this unproductive conversation any longer.
You’re being deliberately obtuse and trying to twist my words. A: fuck you, and B: just don’t respond if you don’t want to engage in conversation.
That’s not polite.
I didn’t twist your words.
You interjected into a conversation and I asked you to explain yourself, wherein you implied that some people deserve genocide. When I pointed this out by quoting you and the person you defended, you cursed at me twice.
While I know that responding to you is definitely a waste of time, I am just drawing a contrast for the reader between us. I did not insult you. I quoted you. I did not twist your words-- I asked you to explain yourself and you insulted me.
I’m still not sure what other interpretation I could lend to your argument as you’ve made it quite clear that party affiliation is more important to you than somebody’s status as a human being.