• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    By voting for a third party you’re worse than someone who doesn’t vote, because you use resources that could be directed to literally anything else and be more effective. Taking all that third party campaign to a casino money and betting it all on a double-zero is more responsible use of the money than spending it on a campaign that will serve no purpose but wasting resources and pulling voters from a candidate that may actually win.

    The only excuses to support a third party candidate are being an idiot or a bad actor intentionally trying to spoil the vote. Which one are you?

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What resource am I redirecting?

      What isn’t effective about a third party vote?

      How are third party resources a waste?

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They have a literal zero percent chance of winning. Hell, most aren’t even on the ballots. Therefore any effort or resources used on their campaign is waste. A vote for them is a waste because it’s impossible for them to win, and that vote could be used to support the better of the 2 major party candidates.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think you’d have a good point if winning was all that mattered in an American election.

          Winning isn’t all that votes decide.

          Poll turnout is used to decide ballot access, funding, event presence and of course for the two major parties policy triangulation.

          That’s not even touching the amount of public awareness that will be built by a third party making a strong showing.