• kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, Ubi is piece of shit nowadays, so it wouldn’t be such a loss in this regard. But hell, no more monopoly pls, tencent is huge enough already…

    • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Taking it private just means taking it off the stock market (the news of it possibly going private has already cause the share price to spike).

      Honestly, public trading of games companies sucks anyway and is what drives all the shit you see from the likes of EA, Take Two, Roblox etc.

      Under private control, and less drive to bleed every drop of value out of every property might mean we can get classics like Beyond Good and Evil again.

      • wrekone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        My personal experience with buyouts from private equity investors is that they will milk every single cent out of the company as they crush its soul. They’re looking to make a huge profit, relatively quickly. Yes, the stock market is also looking to profit, and big share-holders have a lot of sway, but publicly traded companies don’t have to answer to a small number of ultra wealthy puppeteers in quite the same way private equity held companies do. Also, there are certain employee protections, particularly around layoffs, that apply to publicly traded companies but don’t apply to privately held companies. This seems to be one of the key strategies in the PE playbook:

        1. Buy the company / take it private
        2. Slash costs everywhere, including yearly layoffs.
        3. Push the remaining employees to adopt a “lean” or “customer first” mindset, which really means “do more work, faster, for less reward”.
        4. Profit?

        As much as I dislike Ubisoft, I don’t dislike anyone enough to wish that process upon them.

      • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, technically yes, but not under Tencent. These guys will squeeze Ubisofts balls even harder than shareholders do. All stuff that went under Tencent got worse or at least that’s what I remember.

        • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I mean, RIOT has been under Tencent for years at this point and they are mostly doing the same things they did back when they were independent. Only thing you could say that they probably changed is to focus even more on making “cute characters” that sell really well.

          • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I’m not that informed on LOL, stopped playing it like decade ago, but isn’t it what I just said? More push on monetization. Might be subtle, but still it’s there.