My mom is in assisted living and I have a suspicion that the staff, or perhaps a resident, is taking her money. I need something that won’t look out of place and isn’t easily disabled, maybe it plays possum when unplugged but has battery backup. Anyone have any advice?

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just remember that if the staff find out that you apparently trust none of them and believe that they are - potentially - thieves there is a possibility that the level and quality of care your mother receives could diminish. Also, I assume you’ve checked the legality of filming this way in your jurisdiction.

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I don’t think this is true. Most people in health and elder care would rather do their job than risk getting fired or sued because of a rude client.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not suggesting for one second that the mother would have a negative care experience. I’m just stating the obvious that some people would no longer do those extra little things. I notice in some of the care homes I go to that some residents are called by name and some are referred to by room number. All of them have their needs met - just some are treated more compassionately and others are treated only professionally.

    • waka@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This. Go ahead and tell everyone that you are worried about your mother and would like to see her anytime and check on her for your own peace of mind. Post a clear, preferably large, sign up front that there’s an active camera in the room. But do not insist on it. That’ll tell you all you need to know about the staff very quickly.

      For the camera, use a regular old wifi-enabled baby monitor (App-controlled for best results) and connect it to a mobile Internet router. These routers have internal logs - learn how to access them, then check them (remotely, after setting up security in them) at intervals for suspicious reboot events.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        If she’s well enough to consent to this, have her consent. Then install the cameras in such a way that her privacy is not eroded. For example, camera A only sees the door into the room, camera B only sees the night stand, camera C only sees the wardrobe. That sort of thing. Then instruct her to always keep her valuables in a location where at least one camera can monitor.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Assuming you live in the United States, you need to be aware of the laws in the state you live in. Many states are one party consent when it comes to recording. Which means if you and I are having a conversation, you can record it without telling me. One party has consented.

    If on the other hand, you install a camera without your mom’s knowledge, then you are not one of the two parties. This “evidence” could be thrown out of court as it is “illegally aquired”.

    Not to say you shouldn’t do it. Protect your mom’s property. I would just suggest looking into the local laws about it. I am also not a lawyer so you should look into your local laws or consult a lawyer.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      IANAL, but I believe these laws cover audio recording only. OP shouldn’t have an issue if they use something that records video only.

      Think about it a second. I live in a two party consent state, but I see security & surveillance cameras everywhere. If two party consent was required for video then they wouldn’t be there.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        The doorbell cameras that everyone have all record audio, in blatant violation of law, and they hand it over to police. I’m surprised there hasn’t been a court case to really slap those companies on the wrist.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Outdoors are generally not protected by right to privacy, even if on private property.

          Someone standing in their own front lawn can be recorded with both video and audio without their consent.

          This is what makes it legal to record police.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Hmm, interesting. A lot of things make more sense now.

            I think there should be protections a bit stronger than that, at least. You’re forced to go outside to basically live life. If you have a situation where you’re forced to pass through someone else’s property by geometry they lose their right to stop you, and something similar should apply here.

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, that’s mostly true, but the front porch of a home is part of the home for 4th amendment purposes. Police obtaining warrant-less access to your front porch would violate this.

          If someone is out on the street, it can still be illegal depending on the state. In new york, for example, the definition of illegal eavesdropping includes:

          “Mechanical overhearing of a conversation” means the intentional overhearing or recording of a conversation or discussion, without the consent of at least one party thereto, by a person not present thereat, by means of any instrument, device or equipment.

          There’s no no stipulation about location.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The problem isn’t just that it will be thrown out in court, it’s that it itself is illegal.

      Which doesn’t necessarily mean don’t do it but you’re limited in how you can reveal how you know things are being stolen etc.

      • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Agreed. I’m not entirely (barely) versed in the law, but at the very least, if it’s a one party consent state, his mom would “have to set it up”.

        What’s less clear to me is why the drastic action? Start by leaving a 20 on the dresser and see if it stays there.

  • ChexMax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Did you Google this? They have cameras that look like phone chargers. Also, install a non hidden camera and a hidden one.

  • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Im curious what you mean by “plays possum”. Because if it doesn’t have a battery backup it wont work very well unplugged. Been looking at cameras for the house lately, and have yet to find one that flips over and sticks its legs in the air when unplugged.

  • BigLime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    My middle school used alarm clock cameras to spy on us. Cheap-o’s couldn’t be bothered to buy real cameras. I don’t have a link, but it’s just an idea