• tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    300
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You won’t find these symbols on most devices though (certainly not on any macbook as the picture suggests).

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      195
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      By removing the symbols they were able to shave the case down 0.0003nm, making it the thinnest and lightest laptop ever.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I didn’t take the image to be showing a macbook, it could just as easily be my computer or probably many others.

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It could be, but combine the color looking very much like Apple’s space grey, the slimness of it, particularly how slim the lid is versus the body, and what looks like the MacBook’s classic black, rounded rubber stoppers on the bottom, I think it’s safe to say that’s meant to be an MacBook.

        Also certain MacBook models tried to go to a single USB C port about a decade ago, and it was on the corner like that.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      True, my latest Dell laptop has 3 “usb-c shaped ports”, there is 0 symbol anywhere close to them or the underside cover, you’re on your own as to what it supports, you have to find the doc online somewhere I guess.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I discovered that my Thinkpad apparently supports charging from all of the (unlabeled) USB-C ports after I inadvertently started it charging from my cell phone’s (unlabeled) USB-C port.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I can do you one better: My GPD laptop has a charging indicator on the center type-C port indicating that this is where the power supply goes, but it can actually be charged from either port regardless of the icon. Both ports are USB 3.0 or 3.2 or whatever the current fast standard is this week, but only the center one supports video out via an external GPU enclosure. So if you want to use it docked with an eGPU, it’s actually required to not plug the power supply into the port that says you should plug the power supply into it.

          So not only is the marking meaningless, it’s arguably worse than meaningless because in one of the headline hardware setups for the machine it is actually 100% incorrect to do what the marking is telling you to do. Wrap your head around that one…

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tbf my work Dell Latitude 5440 has a USB A with a SS5, an A with a SS5 and charging indicator, a C with a thunderbolt indicator, and a C with a battery and a thunderbolt indicator.

        So at least some of their laptops do in fact have the indicators similar-ish enough to what the infographic shows.

        • Magister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          my 5680 has absolutely nothing. Checking online I found that the right one is a usb-c 3.2 and the 2 left ones are TB4. IIRC they all support DisplayPort and all support being used as the power input (165W charger), not sure for PD and fast charging a cell/tablet…

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Opie did not say targeted advertising OP said get rid of all advertising I was responding to that

        • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re going to find that the appetite for un-targeted advertising to be much lower than that of targeted. The ROI for un-targeted blast is much lower than a smaller more focused targeted campaign.

          As such, you’ll either see even more ads on the same content (in order to obtain similar level of revenue for the publisher), or, as the other user suggested, free ad supported service be a thing of the past.

          Neither of which are good for the mass audience. People already aren’t willing to pay $1 to remove ads on most free ad supported apps, you’re going to find small businesses collapse left right and centre as result of the change.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Nothing worth feeling bad for will collapse.

            People are not willing to get ads into every orifice, just nobody’s asking them. Ad blockers are reactive.

            Bigger businesses will feel more pain, I can promise you that. Smaller businesses do not benefit from this ecosystem, quite the opposite - it heats up those who pay more for advertising, or those who are partners with those doing advertising.

            As of payments again - when you are getting ads into your face with a message that you can pay to use something without them, you naturally feel against it.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      With some devices, I assume that they’re trying to save a bit of money.

      With the MBP, I’m pretty sure that they just don’t want to disrupt the designer’s vision of the aesthetic.

    • hibsen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why would you need them on a MacBook? They’re always* Thunderbolt.

      Edit: Better explained by GamingChairModel below. I entirely forgot one series of MacBook, and also forgot when the older ones did have the Thunderbolt symbol on them.

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The only devices that don’t have at least Thunderbolt 3 on all ports do use the Thunderbolt logo on the ones that support it, except the short-lived 12-inch MacBook (non-Pro, non-Air). Basically, for data transfer:

          • If it’s a 12-inch MacBook, the single USB-C port doesn’t support Thunderbolt, and only supports USB 3.1 Gen 1.
          • In all other devices, if the ports are unmarked, they all support Thunderbolt 3 or higher
          • If the ports are marked with Thunderbolt symbols, those ports support Thunderbolt but the unmarked ports on the same computer don’t.

          For power delivery, every USB-C port in every Apple laptop supports at least first generation USB-PD.

          For display, every USB-C port in every Apple laptop (and maybe even the desktops) supports DisplayPort alt mode.

          It’s annoying but not actually that hard to remember in the wild.

        • hibsen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Okay, the old ones that apparently have both do have the Thunderbolt symbol on the ones that are, though, so what’s the problem?