Am I out of touch?

No, it’s the forward-thinking generation of software engineers that want elegant, reliable, declarative systems that are wrong.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    i mean, provided that the OS has a proper graphical configurator (like most normie OSes), isn’t being declarative just a straight upgrade? Configure everything once when installing and then you never have to repeat that process again.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think your “proper graphical configurator” is doing some heavy lifting there. Of course, there’s no such thing right now, so you’re dealing with the coding yourself in a pretty oddly designed syntactical language, and the terrible official documentation that is the current state of affairs to do it with.

      Other than that, sure, a declaritive and atomic OS would be the way to go.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I thought you meant for a declarative OS like Nix. Which does not have a GUI configurator, nor does any comparable declarative OS. Isn’t that what we’ve been talking about this entire thread?