I’m whooshing regarding the large, yellow… canister? Thingy? What’s going on?
I’m whooshing regarding the large, yellow… canister? Thingy? What’s going on?
Uh oh. What is to come?
No justice. 👎 Boo, hiss.
I don’t get this. The title is obviously (to me) the one near the list of actors and other info. The three words alone are the tag line.
🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️ Might just be me.
Alright, bruh, no problem, you do you.
I’m hyped af, love me a sci-fi with both aliens and time loop shit. Make me wonder, make me think! Take me to the brink! Hit me with a link, don’t let me sink!
Not too far off.
“Live Die Repeat and Repeat”, according to IMDb.
Completely off-topic: I really enjoy the way you express yourself. Do you write a lot? Your text is just very easily consumable, yet not dumbed-down.
And now to make lighter EVs that don’t wear on the road so much.
I thought IIFE’s usually looked like (function (...params) {})(...args). That’s not the latest way? To be honest I never used them much, at least not after arrow functions arrived.
People are down voting you when you are just expressing a feeling. I don’t think that’s right, but I hope you stay for the other great content on Lemmy and only go to Reddit for the missing stuff.
lol, you’d really have to go out of your way in this scenario. First implement a way to get every single permutation of a list, then to ahead with the asinine solution. 😆 But yes, nice one! Your imagination is impressive.
So there’s yet another level of quirkery to this bullshit then, it seems. 😆 Nice digging! 🤝
I also noticed that if you surround the curlies with parentheses, you get the same again:
> eval('{} + []')
0
> eval('({}) + []')
'[object Object]'
I guess, yeah, that’ll do it. Although that’d probably be yet one or a few extra factors involving n.
My experiences in Rocket League can confirm. People being toxic in chat? Tell them something in chat back – get the “tg” to confirm French. Every goddamn time, always the French that are so rude.
Why? Why are they having such a bad day every day? Play a game to have fun ffs.
Where I live, every goddamn girl is wearing yoga pants.
And I’m not complaining.
In node, I get the same result in both cases. "[object Object]"
It’s calling the toString() method on both of them, which in the array case is the same as calling .join(",") on the array. For an empty array, that results in an empty string added to "[object Object]" at either end in the respective case in the picture.
Not sure how we’d get 0 though. Anybody know an implementation that does that? Browsers do that maybe? Which way is spec compliant? Number([]) is 0, and I think maybe it’s in the spec that the algorithm for type coercion includes an initial attempt to convert to Number before falling back to toString()? I dunno, this is all off the top of my head.
Ah yes, mongo and document databases, forgot about those. Yeah those could be a pain to get data from if there’s no structure. 😅
Very cool other facts in that PDF as well.