• 869 Posts
  • 2.75K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle












  • Was it not here yet? What changed?

    Edit: Ah. Better drilling techniques, ironically, pioneered by the fossil fuel industry!

    Latimer and his colleagues improved on traditional geothermal techniques in several ways. But the biggest was this: They utilized horizontal drilling, boring about 10,000 feet down and then 5,000 feet to the side with each well. The technology has been around for decades, but it’s gotten a lot less expensive since the mid-2000s due to widespread adoption by oil and gas companies.

    Nice that this drilling technology can be used in green energy applications too.



  • Great article. I love the (possible?) subtle dig at SpaceX’s development process, along with the acknowledgment that building a rocket factory is more difficult than building a rocket.

    If you lay the first rocket that we ever built, Flight 1, against Flight 50, the rockets are largely the same. We didn’t put a minimum viable product on the pad and then have to go back and redesign it. That was important because we came out of the gate with Flight 2, Flight 3, and Flight 4 all in quick succession. We built something to be produced. It’s often said that production of rockets is just way harder than building the first one, and I think that’s accurate.

    P.S. Anyone else read Peter Beck’s sections in his voice?







  • I posted this in another thread, but figured I’d post it here as well.

    TL;DW highlights:

    • 01:15 Current Starfactory designed to produce 100 ships per year.
    • 02:30 Aiming for 200 tonnes to orbit with full reusability
    • 11:20 Starlink missions on Starship are not a priority for 2024
    • 15:00 Currently design not able to cope with the loss of a single tile on the pressurized tank portion. Future designs incorporating a backup ablative layer underneath tiles.
    • 17:30 Mass savings of passive vs active heat shield might not be as much as they originally thought, since the mass of the ceramic heat shield has grown. Elon still confident that passive shield is best for reentry from interplanetary transfer.
    • 21:30 Linear-adjacent flow (assembly line) for vehicle production.
    • 27:20 IFT-3 loss of ship control. Valves got clogged by ice. Elon confirms that they are tapping off the preburner for ullage gas to repressurize the oxygen tank. They’ve added better “ice strainers” and will add redundant valves in the future.
    • 33:45 Reducing number of grid fins is not a high priority.
    • 36:00 Still several thousand changes between each vehicle. Primary payload on these test flights is data.
    • 42:00 Future raptor versions will have cooling circuits integrated into various parts, reducing the total number of parts, bolted joints, welded joints, and the need for engine heat shields
    • 47:30 Long-term goal for raptor thrust is 330 tonne-force.
    • 50:00 Separate propellant depot likely not needed for Artemis, just dock tankers directly to Starship HLS.
    • 54:30 Tile attachement points
    • 56:45 Ship header tank
    • 57:45 Pez door test on IFT-3 “had some issues”.
    • 1:00:45 Tesla drive units are still used for actuating the booster grid fins and ship flaps. Striving to eliminate all hydraulics on the vehicle.

    Side note at 01:40 on Falcon 9 upper stage production: Close to 200 this year, likely over 200 next year.


  • TL;DW highlights:

    Pre-IFT-4:

    • 03:20 Current ships do not have catch points, future ships will.
    • 04:00 Catch point design is a trade off between an inefficient but precise landing with small catch points, or an efficient hoverslam but imprecise landing with beefy catch points.
    • 04:50 Forward flaps move the center of pressure too far forward, and the ship has the tendency to enter engines-first. Current forward flaps are too big. Rear flaps do the main bulk of controlling the pitch. Forward flaps just trim the roll and yaw.
    • 10:30 “If you could have done iterative design on Falcon 9, would you?” “We couldn’t have done Starship without the lessons from Falcon 9.”
    • 12:00 Tower B upgrades: Taller for next gen Starship. Arms will be shorter. Current arms have too much inertia.
    • 13:00 OLM redesign: “More of a flame trench?” “Yeah.” Also, hold-down/launch arms redesigned to reduce risk of binding during liftoff.

    Post-IFT-4:

    • 20:30 Reentry heating was observable from the internal cameras (visible, not IR cameras), but the stainless steel held up.
    • 21:20 Hinge needs to be beefed up on S30. Thicker tiles, thinner the gaps between tiles, better gap filler, tightening tolerances.
    • 22:55 Moving the forward flaps leeward is now a priority for Starship V2. Redesign front support structure.
    • 24:20 “Did all flaps have similar burn-through?” “No. Right foreflap took the most damage.” This was concluded based on how much control authority each flap had. Elon speculates that the tile gaps on the right foreflap happened to be slightly worse than the other flaps. Ship maintained stability, but was not able to steer to pinpoint landing location (off by 6 km).
    • 28:00 Booster landing was accurate enough to attempt tower catch on IFT-5. “You don’t feel like you need to have tower 2 ready before you do that?” “No, not necessarily. We do have replacement parts for the arms. They are a better set of arms.”
    • 29:00 Tower catch attempt contingent on talking it over with the teams. Rarely does Elon drop an imperial decree :)
    • 29:20 IFT-5 profile? Repeat of IFT-4? In-space Raptor relight? Undecided at this point.
    • 29:50 Update on the two rear tiles which were intentionally removed: One had two layers of ablative shielding, the other had one layer. One layer burned through, but two layers didn’t burn through.
    • 30:30 IFT-5 between 30 and 60 days (Elon time :), depending on changes needed to 30.