I’m assuming this is some guy plastering his house with the King’s picture - the sort of thing you’d expect in a monarchy rule, not democracy.
I’m assuming this is some guy plastering his house with the King’s picture - the sort of thing you’d expect in a monarchy rule, not democracy.
Mark has always been icky for me. I watch these kinds of videos almost excellently - the science-tech ones; yet I avoid him like the plague.
We’ve had 45 presidents no? Is he leaving out 2 or did he say this during the 43rd? If he is leaving out, who are the 2 based ones?
That price wouldn’t even begin to cover it. Infrastructure is expensive at that quality. Engineers to maintain such infrastructure are also expensive. Content creators make a ton of money too. Their profits are much lower compared to peers - https://mannhowie.com/youtube-valuation
Also, 22$/month gets you a family plan for 5 people so wtf are you talking about?
I don’t give 2 shits about YouTube, I use ad block where I can too. I’m just saying that people who complain about YouTube’s anti-adblock stuff are being unrealistic, you can’t fault them for trying to block people from stealing from them.
Are you saying that the ads shouldn’t be video ads but webpage ads, instead?
It’s their job.
Yeah, exactly why they are enforcing anti-adblock rules…
they’re good sharks, Bront
How do you propose YouTube should pay for infrastructure costs (servers, Internet etc), staff costs (engineers, designers, moderators) and the content creators?
Coincidentally I’m on a train too and the whole train car is complaining about me furiously masturbating at the picture.
You taking your experience with a few AliExpress sellers & Tiktok owners and generalizing it to Chinese culture is the definition of racism.
This is incredibly racist. So I really hope this is a troll post.
WDYM? Common Vietnamese W
Okay, I don’t have a lot of confidence in this, but I assume the average American is actually pro-Israel? At least the swing “independent” voters?
Like I know young people are pro-Palestine but those people probably wouldn’t vote for Trump in any case and probably live in strongly blue states?
How is that even possible good lord? 5000 pages?
I don’t know what you are even arguing. My point is India is democratic and secular despite being flawed. Do you not agree with that? If you don’t agree with that, why are you worried about the word “secular” being removed? How does it matter anyway?
Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.
My point is India is democratic and secular - and that’s an achievement in South Asia (that’s why compared to Pakistan). And that has made it more developed. So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.
If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?
Right, so went from “no persecution” to “police addressed it”. Cool cool. Can you point me to perpetrators of the genocide being punished?
I am wondering this too. I can’t imagine why they would be this sloppy. It’s also possible that it is one executive who is trying to save himself and maybe throw someone else under the bus.
no refugees
Not true - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_India
fall to the Hindu majority who would nationilze around their identity and oppress everyone else which is exactly what happend
It’s not even close to that. For sure there needs to be big improvements in minority rights but it’s not even close to what Pakistan (and Bangladesh) are. India is heavily flawed but still has a functional democracy and secular state while not a single PM in Pakistan has completed a full term. Lol like they are not even comparable. If anything, India is an achievement of secularism and a good example of why you should separate the church and state.
just gives credit for Pakistan’s purpose
Now that is a circular argument because the nationalists say “look at Pakistan and Bangladesh, Muslims got that, why aren’t we getting one?”. So creation of Pakistan is what gives credit to their argument.
For its purpose of avoiding being an oppressed minority, it succeded.
Did they? Do Pakistani Muslims lead better life than Indian Muslims?
How exactly?
They claim that they are doing this to help non-muslim refugees fleeing places like Pakistan. Their claim is that they can’t accommodate all refugees so the first preference is for non-muslims being persecuted.
If Pakistan didn’t exist, this persecution wouldn’t be there?
Wait how did they do all that WITHOUT contact?