i dont know a single child who has the same fears kids in movies do
i am confused what OP wants to happen, i would probably say this is a change for the better that i would not mind for the sake of privacy?
just like subscribe to some ppl or something like,
waiting for the win1-core rice in the comments
kafka metamorphosis good ending:
ppl just choose not to be responsible
you should look into some common causes of car accident, which include:
cars are safer than theyve ever been
overall, my position is the same as yours: the average driver is WILDLY unfit to operate a multiton chunk of metal on a daily basis.
however, it is wildy unrealistic to hope against hope that one day, every driving person will wake up and realize that they should drive safe. there has to be systemic effort, whether thats reduction in cars, increase in mandatory car training or increased access to public transport, in order to see systemic improvement.
while you are factually correct that the human is a part of the chain of blame, it is systemically inefficient to blame the driver
in order to make systemic change and make cars safer, we CANNOT say “oh lol drivers fault, get good.” expecting that order of change from hoards of people is unrealistic.
however if i blame unsafely sized cars, fast, wide unsafe roads, a failure of US public transport—these are also realistic points of systemic change that i can point to.
tldr cars are unsafe, cars need to get safer, no amount of blaming the driver will solve things
the car absolutely kills people. that same big mac licking driver on a bike or bus or scooter causes 0 deaths. it’s the cars
the pyramid is built from the ground up, garic bread is a basic necessity whereas soap gives self fulfillment
mental health is not a joke friends, not even when men and boys are the butt of your funny 😌😌
incredible post, captures the zeitgeist
well thats just a given
with your help we can combine the two! introducing the kilotape,
this isn’t necessarily a valid syllogism depending on how you interpret the first premise you could call it:
All stupid ideas are had by liberals
but it could also be
Some stupid ideas are had by liberals
and we don’t know which OP meant. if the latter, an I-A-A syllogism is invalid.
because the language of the first premise is ambiguous, it cannot be definitely stated that the argument posed by anon is valid
good content op tysm for ur service 🫡
deserved