If you wrote the type signature of get_user as tuple[User, None] | tuple[None, Exception], the assertion would not be necessary and the type checker wouldn’t complain.
If you wrote the type signature of get_user as tuple[User, None] | tuple[None, Exception], the assertion would not be necessary and the type checker wouldn’t complain.
+1, no problems at all so far, been using them almost daily for a year now on both linux and android.
and even today, by using an old Android API iirc
Nope, the required API to have your app in the Playstore constantly rises, and if you don’t comply you get kicked. The current API version is something around 26, and definitely has the permissions model integrated.
Well how do you want to use said get function?
let x = config.get("key").await;
So what type should x have?
You can see it in the image you linked.
What do you mean exactly? A running system shouldn’t spontaneously break from not being updated. It’s just that partial upgrades can break compatibility/dependencies, but running full system upgrades should be fine, as long as you pay attention to breaking changes and major version bumps. Also with timeshift it should always be possible to get back to a working state.
Can you still hibernate and suspend?
Die Komplexen Zahlen sind auch nur eine Untermenge der reellen 2x2 Matrizen, also lassen sich zumindest so darstellen.
Wenn jemand also behauptet, das es die komplexen Zahlen nicht gibt, sollte man ihn mal Fragen, ob es überhaupt die reelen oder ganzen Zahlen gibt.
Sogar bei den natürlichen Zahlen kann man streiten, weil 3 existiert eben auch nicht physikalisch. Nur 3 Äpfel beispielsweise.
Zahlen waren schon immer nur Werkzeuge, die weder richtig/falsch oder existent/nicht existent sein können. Die konkreten Konzepte und Ideen dahinter sind das entscheidende. Wie man diese dann darstellt ist nur nebensächlich.