• 0 Posts
  • 143 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle



















  • … but I want to acknowledge that at least for now there’s no actual evidence of it.

    I wouldn’t call a multi-year class action asserting that a clause exists “no evidence”.

    (I mostly continue on this point because I will continue to go around saying Valve uses a PMFN clause, and it’s not unfounded for me to do so)

    What other explanation for the observed behavior can be put forth?

    For games being the same price on different store fronts? Whatever the justification for selling digital games at the same price as physical games was back when digital purchases were becoming mainstream, or for the same reason that Nintendo games will rarely go on sale: because there are still people willing to pay.

    Alright, if you’re not convinced that there ought to naturally be differentiated pricing, and that the uniform pricing we see is artificial, I don’t know where else to go.

    Is it? Because I pulled the term from the complaint filed Apr 27, 2021 under the Price Veto Provision section. Where did you see a valve employee saying it?

    Ah, I was thinking of the “TomG” quotes here. I see what you’re referencing now, though that doesn’t really make the language as less ambiguous.


    Anyway, I enjoyed the discussion but I’m going to call it here. Cheers.