Bueno, yo hago lo mismo para participar en comunidades en inglés, con un poco de atención a lo que pone ya practicas mucho.

¿Francés, canadiense o africano?

Pues no se como va lo de los niveles o si el a2 es muy alto, pero por lo menos por escrito lo haces muy bien, espero que tengas suerte.

¿Cuál es tu idioma nativo?

últimamente he visto Sugar de apple+, tiene un giro de guion a mitad de temporada que te deja el culo torcido, pero aun así me ha gustado bastante, la recomiendo.

Sorry for the mistake, I’m not an English speaker and I didn’t know that, thanks for helping me

Edit: I don’t understand why they downvoted you, you have been kind and I really appreciate improving my English.

I would like to introduce you to [email protected]

My daughter and my nephew (boy), both 5, have just taken a shower together during our vacation, their conversation about different genitals has been great, although I don’t think it is completely appropriate to reproduce it here

Si he visto algún caso de esos, me hacen pensar con envidia en los tiempos de la democracia censitaria.

Yo si, y puede que sea que me esté haciendo viejo, pero los veo tontísimos, no creo que puedan decidir ni sobre su propia ropa sin hacer el ridículo, como para decidir sobre el gobierno.

Not only do we have our own deck, we also have our own games, ask about the mus or the subastado

El sorprende hecho de que las cosas existan antes de que los expertos las conozcan

Si es que además es parte de la gracia, probar la comida local, la cultura y costumbre y claro, también aprender alguna cosa del idioma, que menos.

I hope that if that happens it will be the kick in the ass we need to start setting up our own racket.

P.S. I don’t like military gear, but yours are better than the alternative

Yes, after all the answers I think I am beginning to see the problem, it is not the electoral system but your vision of it. That is why time and time again the answers are about the position of president and not about the system as a whole. You don’t care, you don’t understand that the present is the most powerful individual person, but the presidency is not the most powerful institution, the Congress and the Senate have much more power, being powerful there is much more important than putting a person in office. Not to mention the number of laws, measures and issues that do not even reach the federal level.

In 2010 they had a coalition government made up of Torys and Liberals, in Great Britain the executive power is not just the Prime Minister, it is the entire Council of Ministers and it was not made up only of Torys. Obviously a coalition government is not possible in the American system, but a third party being influential in the cameras is and I still don’t see because it is impossible

I know and understand the difference between parliamentarism and presidentialism, but I am not talking about the election of presidents exclusively, I am talking about the political system of the country in general. If 20~30% of the chambers are in the hands of a third party, the country becomes more plural and public debates better represent opinions and I don’t understand why that is not possible.

I don’t know, I don’t deny what you say, but as I was answering to another, then the United States is not a democracy anymore, it is a plutocracy where a few elites can decide policies, but the population lacks the capacity to change the trends even if there is a broad consensus for it.

this is sad

But you have a parliament (congress and senate), right? Why isn’t there a third party in these chambers?

Well, I don’t know, like I said before I’m not American and I don’t know all the ins and outs of the American electoral system, but if this is really impossible, I’ll just stop thinking of the United States as a democracy in any way. Changing the democrats party from within has proven impossible since Hillary’s rigged election in 2016, moving her policies to the left runs into a constant wall of “this is how we will lose the center”, well, I don’t know, I just think the system is so broken that either something different is done or it’s not going to be fixed

Well, if that only applies at the presidential level, a party can be created that competes at the legislative and state level. When it is established with enough power at that level, running at the presidential level might not be such a risky game.

The British have a first past the post system and more than two parties, something else is wrong in that equation