Because some of them find value in building a community, because humans are quite social.
Because some of them find value in building a community, because humans are quite social.
calls someone a doomer
doesn’t want to damage economy for the sake of having a habitable planet for humans
this is a democracy
You mean like the 2000 election?
Y’all got a transcript or something, good lord
Send in the national guard Biden
In practice there’s still extreme racial segregation across a lot of US schools. I recall a good article on the NY school system but can’t find it.
Sweden has a slightly higher youth unemployment rate and they are only counting the actual labour force, i.e. people actively willing to work and not students.
I think it’s a bit silly to suggest that the Chinese government killed a bunch of statisticians at the National Bureau of Statistics for publishing this data that’s actually not as bad as you might in English language news sources.
I particularly enjoyed when the parliamentarian when brought out to kill the $15 minimum wage proposal being included in a Bill, leading to many Americans finding out they had the parliamentarian in the first place.
I imagine you’re bang on about that figure being the remuneration
The next question that comes to mind is - you know the number of students, deduct that from your percentage and you’re done.
The answer is probably that labour force data like this is usually collected through surveys of samples of the population, while the enrolment data would be collected from educational institutions.
On a year-on-year basis, GDP expanded 6.3% in the second quarter, accelerating from 4.5% in the first three months of the year, but the rate was below the forecast for growth of 7.3%.
You’re suggesting that China is very democratic then?
What part would even be commercial in confidence? What a rort
National Bureau of Statistics spokesman Fu Linghui on Tuesday said the release of the data would be suspended from August as the way the jobless rate was calculated needed to be improved to reflect the changing society.
He said there were 65 million students in the 16-24 age group and it was questionable whether they should be included in the unemployment figures before they graduated.
On the face of it, this seems quite reasonable.
You would expect that youth unemployment would capture the young people in the labour force, i.e. the number of people actually looking to work.
There are some cool neopronouns out there
Like old reddit the_donald bad
This seems pretty inaccurate?
The advancement in drone warfare over 18 months is honestly shocking
It wasn’t just any Brit, it was Churchill himself
I don’t believe there is any 4chan connection - instead slop is used in the sense of