How is this not relevant to open source ideology?

I wasn’t joking. That shit hurts me deep. It shows a lack of understanding of my struggles that I really don’t try to hide. I forget things, always. They’re not lies. They’re not things that don’t matter to me. Its everything all the time

I like it

Some stuff won’t work such as android auto

Cheaper to print in bulk

Every American election for /years/ was coke v Pepsi. Not sure when it became coke v battery acid, nor why so many people are like “well I don’t like cola so maybe it will be okay to drink battery acid” and why it is that the Democrats still want to run coke when America has made it abundantly clear we’d like to be offered the chance to drink SOME CLEAN FUCKING WATER JESUS FUCKING CHRIST

I feel for the guy. Had health issues and needed money fast. I kinda don’t blame him. Like I get its disappointing and I also won’t blame people being mad at him, but I’m more mad at the overall system of how things get funding

I do not understand how Elizabeth Warren didn’t get more interest 4 years ago. She was clearly the best candidate and one who has the kind of broad appeal Bernie Sanders does. I think I’m at a point where my belief is that the bankers who are probably gonna vote Republican anyway who fund campaigns very explicitly don’t want someone like Sanders or Warren to be president

Nothing wounds me more than people saying if I cared I’d remember

Okay but does seeing the blender after the honeymoon period fill you with guilt about your lack of discipline to stick to something?

Fair. I didn’t realize the others had expanded their portion of the market that much. Last time I was looking at reports “other” only had <1% of the market.

Which is a form of capital. Our politicians use that power for monetary profit. That shits just intrinsic to building an entire system with capitalism at it’s heart like we been doing since the late 60s

Third. It goes AWS, with about 50% of the market, Azure with around 40%, and then GCP

Yeah the pixel hardware is the only thing they make that I think is any good and I run graphene on mine

People miss that Adam Smith in his writing was arguing in favor of small enterprise and in favor of the government busting up monopolies

Power and benefit, also sometimes referred to with the term “capital”

SAFe SCRUM is a fucking scam. Anyone who proposes it as a solution to a problem is out of touch and doesn’t recognize a waterfall when they see one

We’re British imperialists at the end if the day. We traveled across the seas to a new continent and destroyed it for… So little benefit

After all these years any time a company with a poor product buys a company with a good product, I’ve stopped assuming the poor product will become more like the good product

Their packages are consistently named differently than their Ubuntu/Debian counterpart

I agree with all your points, but this one has way more to do with Debian being a bunch of weirdos about how packages are packaged. Its really more of a Debian demerit than anything since sometimes their packaging practices can be somewhat hostile to projects not directly associated with Debian, especially since the Debian community can have a certain “Our way is the only right way” attitude. That said, the Debian packaging standards can make it easier as a developer to experiment with creating a software package to interact with an existing package. Like there’s a reason to do it that I can support and I wish Debian packagers would more often say “we package things like this so people can experiment” instead of “Everyone else does packaging wrong and our way is the only way”