Not sure I understood everything, but it reads as if the image creator added secrets into the image? Wouldn’t that be the problem of the image creator, instead of people using the image?
Not sure I understood everything, but it reads as if the image creator added secrets into the image? Wouldn’t that be the problem of the image creator, instead of people using the image?
nope, I honestly think NFTs/Crypto/Blockchain/Web3 stuff was a bigger bubble, in that it was a technology that has practically NO real use.
AI is definitely more useful. Yes, the money pumped into it is possibly far more than into Web3 stuff, but I think the big players like MS, Alphabet and so on would not invest heavily into it, if they did not see huge potential.
Oh shit, I remember there WAS a game. I believe I bought a Geforce 2 MX or sth for it…could have been an FPS, possibly Unreal Tournament.
Which is actually not a big difference to what companies have done the past couple of decades, namely moving positions from high-cost to low-cost countries. Cost for an AI is problably easier to mask in the balance sheet as well, as costs for human resources.
Was für eine Zeitung druckt so einen polemischen Mist überhaupt ab?
offensichtlich die krone
You can’t keep anyone, at all, not porn, not Zuckerberg, not Nazis, nobody, off the Fediverse. It’s actually impossible. All you can do is defederate the things you do not wish to associate with.
Isn’t that possibly creating echo chambers again?
Ah, that makes more sense then. Thanks.