I absolutely see the problem, but making users host their own server to host their actor profile and posts is just too complicated. I mean why not just host the whole AP server then… Additionally it reminded me a lot of Activity Pods
Beruflich Web-Entwickler, privat ein Ober Nerd und Links-Grün versifft…
Musik Liebhaber, von #kpop bis #metal alles dabei
Ansonsten bin ich auch gerne mit der Kamera unterwegs.
ich bin auch auf mastodon: @BentiGorlich
Ich betreibe thebrainbin.org, gehirneimer.de und wehavecookies.social
I absolutely see the problem, but making users host their own server to host their actor profile and posts is just too complicated. I mean why not just host the whole AP server then… Additionally it reminded me a lot of Activity Pods
Very cool
I hate that there are no full dance covers yet 😁 Love the song
Ah ok great, thanks for explaining
How does it work? I can’t find any info about that in [email protected] at least not in the description or a pinned post
Think of it this way: there is currently no way to block an instance from a users perspective, there simple isn’t (and yes we should add one). What blocking a domain is for: I hate everything the guardian posts, I don’t want to see anything talking about that.
well server uptime is usually, and in the case of fediverse observer, coupled to a successful response. If the server spits out a 500 internal server error, that does not count as being up
Thats why I meant threads linking to the url. It has nothing to do with a users home instance…
And there is magazine hosted on his instance for it: [email protected]
He does not have a donation page, yet. The GitHub repo for it: https://github.com/jwr1/interstellar
Do you mean blocking a domain? So navigating to /d/domain_to:block
? If you do: that block all posts that have a url linking to kbin. Since comments do not link to anything they will not be blocked by this. If you want a feature like this, please consider making an issue over on github in the mbin repo
Interstellar could support iOS, but the dev was actually the one that told me about the costs and that he just don’t want to pay it. Maybe he could be convinced to support iOS if a developer or tester with an iPhone helped him and the community chipped in for the dev account. After all he does everything for free, like most of us do
I think the instance is not showing because it is not online at the moment… here you can see the stats of kbin.social on fediverse observer https://kbin.fediverse.observer/kbin.social
Regarding the amount of instances and the rather small users/server: a lot of the mbin instances used to be kbin ones (like you can tell by their name) including mine. So we did not start with one central instance that all the users went to, but with a lot that already had a small number of users. And the project itself is not that old, not even a year (we start in September or October 2023). I’d say we really only have one hyperfocused instance and that being rimworld.gallery
I’ve recently heard that an iOS developer account costs 100$/year. I think that’s one of the reasons why…
aus Erfahrung kann ich sagen dass sich auf den Namen der Software zu stützen auch nicht ideal ist. Zum Beispiel gibts ja jetzt ein Haufen mbin Instanzen die kbin im Namen haben… Lemming.eu würde ich euch also nicht empfehlen Glaube mein Favorit wäre dach.zone
Actually the only team where I was like: “This is exactly the kind of soccer I don’t want to see”…
The german moderator went on and on about how Bellingham was the best man on the field. That might be correct, but he was also the one I was most upset with as he constantly faked stuff and was disrespectful to the opponents and to the referee…
mbin has had an accessible API for a few months now. You can use Interstellar with for example (not on iOS thuogh)