• 12 Posts
  • 1.76K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle




  • Flat design may be less distracting to you but that also means it’s less clear, because there are fewer obvious demarcation.

    I despise flat design, it’s downright awful design, and done for looks rather than functionality.

    to you

    Flat design dominates for a reason—the less visually busy something is, the easier it is for users to wrap their heads around it. This gets proven again and again in user studies, the more busy and dense you make things, the more users miss stuff and get lost.

    People’s opinions on the ribbon specifically are obviously all subjective, but I would say the less distracting design would be the one done less for looks, rather it’s a pretty utilitarian design if you pick it apart. This is an interface for productivity tools, and as such the interface should get out of your way until you need it—the ribbon just does that better IMO.

    Microsoft also did this to obfuscate features, which is pretty apparent when you consider new users used to “discover” features via the menu system. I supported Office for MS in the early days, and this was a huge thing at the time. It was discussed heavily when training on new versions.

    Why on earth would Microsoft want to obfuscate features? There’s no way that motivation would ever make sense.

    IIRC one of the main reasons Microsoft introduced the ribbon was that grouping functionality contextually helped users discover features, because people kept requesting features that already existed, but they just couldn’t find. I remember there being a blog on the Microsoft developer site about the making of it that went into this.



  • 9point6@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldWhy is UI design backsliding?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Weirdly as someone who has used both styles heavily, I’d say the ribbon is more practical than the old toolbars. There’s more contextual grouping and more functional given the tabs and search, plus the modern flat design is less distracting, which is what I’d want from a productivity application. Also for me two rows of toolbars & a menu is about the same height as the ribbon anyway, and you can collapse the ribbon if you want to use the space






  • I was literally looking for something like this the other day

    The best I could find was a nearly two grand a month season pass that would only let me go between the two stations I would use most.

    Imagine the car you could get on lease, insured, taxed and filled up with petrol for that money

    It’s completely unbalanced to an embarrassingly ridiculous degree. We need to remove all subsidies being put into car travel and shift it into public transport


  • This is all assuming it’s a spinning disk and not an SSD, so ignore me if that’s the case:

    Given SAS drives are usually used in data centre storage array applications and 3TB disks have been kinda small for that use case for a fair while, there’s a fairly high chance it was in heavy use for a good number of years. I’d bet it’s probably well on its way to being a paperweight regardless of your connectivity situation.

    If you do get it hooked up, don’t store anything on it you wouldn’t be okay losing.