In case anyone still wants to somehow debate whether the Liberals will deliver affordable housing.

“Housing needs to retain its value,” Mr. Trudeau told The Globe and Mail’s City Space podcast. “It’s a huge part of people’s potential for retirement and future nest egg.”

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t get what the point is except for investors.

    People using it as a “retirement holdings” might try to sell and then find they can’t afford to live anywhere in retirement.

    People saving property to leave an inheritance have kids waiting for their parents to die so they can afford a home to own.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Actually, w.r.t. to retirement savings it can be valuable as a lot of the better assisted living arrangements will require an upfront payment of hundreds of thousands of dollars for unexpected expenses along with a regular rent expenditure.

      This is arguably an awful way to finance elder care and doesn’t justify making housing unaffordable but that stored value is useful if you think you’ll need assisted living.

      • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        So in 30 years when I need assisted living but was never able to afford a house, what am I supposed to do? Die in the street?

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Our government really should have better programs to assist seniors and there should be non profit, government owned and operated assisted living available. Over 1 million seniors needed to use the new dental benefit so clearly there is an issue with how canada treats their seniors financially.

        • psvrh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes.

          Because by that point, the Boomers will have been soaked for trillions by the LTC industry. The investors will have already be rich and will have moved on to the next victim.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hey, no worries… I’ve been getting deep in the weeds on this one as my mom is in her eighties and trying to decide how to allocate her savings for her EOL.

      • Someone@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It really sounds like the issue there is just another subset of housing (un)affordability.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh, definitely… and the consolidation of assisted living into fewer and fewer PE firms should scare the shit out of everyone - but it is important to remember that a few people would be screwed if the housing market suddenly collapsed… that said, we absolutely should deflate this market - we just need to consider some fixes for the house-wealthy cash-poor older folks who might be really fucked by this.

          • Someone@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, I do think the assisted living industry would be forced to adjust though. It’s not like the real estate market in general, if the majority of their potential buyers simply don’t have enough money it’s not like they can pivot to other demographics or attract wealthy people from outside the country.

            If things aren’t corrected, it won’t be long before a whole generation of new seniors is cash poor with no house to sell.

    • SamuelRJankis@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      then find they can’t afford to live anywhere in retirement.

      I think the plausible circumstance is them selling and moving out of Canada, really it’s the logical thing to do when you destroy the eco system you inhabit for gains. Then the money also gets spent out of Canada, we might spend less on healthcare cost for the elderly but I could see the math working out to be a net loss.

        • jadero@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Or moving to SK

          Same thing. (Or was that the joke?)

          Lifelong SK resident.

        • SamuelRJankis@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          The countries people like going to is Mexico, Costa Rica, Portugal, Vietnam, Thailand off the top of my head. They’re pretty happy to take retirees with money.