• apotheotic(she/they)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The whole thing is that NATO protects its member states right? That’s why Vlad the Sad attacked a non member state?

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, you’ve got it right. If Ukraine had been a member, Putin would have found another country to invade. Bullies pick on weak loners, not kids with lots of tough friends. The combined strength of NATO is more than the Russian military can handle.

      I don’t understand why this article was written the way that it was. Although the author makes several valid points, it is most definitely not NATO’s job to police all of Europe. NATO exists to ensure the security of member states. Aside from some unlikely situations, “strength in numbers” is all NATO is for. A simple idea, but an effective one.

      I do agree that Europe should be doing more to help Ukraine. That has absolutely nothing to do with the current condition of NATO, though. This could have been a powerful opinion piece, but my main takeaway is that the author doesn’t seem to understand NATO’s duties or purpose.