• scrion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Circular selection, fill?

    Or, for an annulus: circular selection, border, enter border width, fill.

    Or, for any selection in general: edit, stroke selection.

    • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      Circular selection, fill?

      Isn’t that how you do that in Photoshop?

      For a certified maniac there’s also one bump of a brush with 100% hardness and using gradient tool, radial, with no actual gradations.

      And if you are feeling like killing a school bus of puppies, you can put a coin or a mug to the screen with one hand while drawing around it with the other, using a live mouse, biting you, as you move it and hallucinate the formation of the ideal circular form.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, most of the times for shapes in Photoshop you’d use the shape tool, which can generate them in raster, or better, as paths, allowing you to modify them later non-destructively.

        • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I loved how non-destructive placement of existing graphics works but I can’t remember when I used the shape tool in PS without going straight to AI for it’s shape-building anchor-induced shenanigans. Can you tell what use besides non-pixelated masks you’ve used in your workflow? It’s the only application I can think of, but that’s maybe because my field of use is too narrow.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I dunno, I haven’t used it in years. You could create objects from layers of shapes with effects applied to them, together with masks and such, for example. TBH I almost never used the basic shapes, I’d mostly create paths with the pen.

            The thing with Photoshop is that it’s such a large software that nobody uses all of it, but every part is used by somebody.

            • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Thanks.

              The thing with Photoshop is that it’s such a large software that nobody uses all of it, but every part is used by somebody.

              Same with other their products. For me it’s a permanent love-hate perception of Adobe for they are making these cool tools but are very, very greedy. Yet, I still can’t really get into other tools that don’t copy them.

              • Damage@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah I’ve got the same problems with CAD/CAM… I’ve gotten so used to SOLIDWORKS/Inventor that it’s hard to switch to open alternatives.

                Oh yah now I remember that I also used the shape tool to add or subtract from selections without having to keep the space bar pressed.

      • scrion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        No idea about Photoshop, never got to use it. The last piece of bitmap graphic editing software I used other than Gimp was Micrografx Picture Publisher 4/5, and that has been a while.

        I’ll admit I do see some quality of life features in Photoshop though, plus I’d like to play around with some of the “AI” feature for infilling etc.

        That being said, from what I gather from OP, there seems to be a circular shape tool that saves 2-3 clicks when drawing a circle in PS? Looking at the pros/cons, not a convincing argument, but then again, I don’t look at memes for any meaningful argument or a reasonable discussion.