Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Not owning something? sure, that’s not necessarily the best way to define someone. especially in a post apocalyptic wasteland.
But there are certain benchmark things that are consequential enough to define someone. Not having reliable access to shelter is pretty descriptive of a person’s situation.
I don’t think you could argue that the only difference between someone who owns their own functional and crewed yacht - and a person who is homeless, is personal preference/taste. Regardless of an apocalypse.
But, I wouldn’t expect the mansionless to understand the nuances of owning things so don’t worry about it too much /s
Honestly, I’m loving the slur mansionless. Thank you for this
Not owning something? sure, that’s not necessarily the best way to define someone. especially in a post apocalyptic wasteland.
But there are certain benchmark things that are consequential enough to define someone. Not having reliable access to shelter is pretty descriptive of a person’s situation.
I don’t think you could argue that the only difference between someone who owns their own functional and crewed yacht - and a person who is homeless, is personal preference/taste. Regardless of an apocalypse.
But, I wouldn’t expect the mansionless to understand the nuances of owning things so don’t worry about it too much /s
Honestly, I’m loving the slur mansionless. Thank you for this