Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
I mean, returning non-zero exit status on error is just good practice. It even managed to evaluate to the same numerical value as EXIT_FAILURE when I tested it on my machine (gcc 11.4.0 linux x86-64), although I’m not sure if that’s always the case or if it’s undefined behavior.
Does it make me a bad person that I like this?
Edit: wait…
return ! 0 ;
wtfEdit 2: idc still like it frfr no cap
I mean, returning non-zero exit status on error is just good practice. It even managed to evaluate to the same numerical value as
EXIT_FAILURE
when I tested it on my machine (gcc 11.4.0 linux x86-64), although I’m not sure if that’s always the case or if it’s undefined behavior.This cursed code is quite well-written.
!0 is defined as 1, that’s how argv [ no cap ] works, that and the ridiculous argc check stood out as a bit off, but works
Yes.