• sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    5·
    3 months ago

    Let’s look at events objectively.

    Person A: Doesn’t like something and so publicly criticises it.

    Person B: Asks for an opportunity to defend the thing and themselves.

    Person A: Says no

    Person B: Insists

    Person A: Then posts about person B on social media in a defamatory manner.

    Social Media: Well person B is a CEO, so it’s par for the course.

    Me: Actually, it’s par for the course that someone be given the right to defend themselves

    You: You’re victim blaming.

    Me: 🥴

    Honestly, I don’t give a shit either way. I don’t even know the name or URL of the search engine and I doubt I’ll ever meet Lori. I just posted my opinion on something that was in my feed. 🤦🏾‍♂️

    • Tracteur Blindé@beehaw.org
      17·
      3 months ago

      “Objective” timeline
      Omits the repeated communications that are the source of the discourse

      Seems like you missed some things in your first read of the Mastodon thread. That might be why you’re not getting the response you’re expecting.

    • snooggums@midwest.socialEnglish
      15·
      3 months ago

      Me: Actually, it’s par for the course that someone be given the right to defend themselves

      You still don’t get it.