Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
In a thousand years from now, I honestly think 100PB is small for a thumb drive. I’ve seen such drastic increase in storage density in my lifetime that, while I don’t expect it, I wouldn’t be surprised if I see 100PB in single storage devices at some point in my lifetime.
I’m already dealing with PB-sized storage clusters at work, so the need for that k8nd of storage is already there, and necessity drives innovation.
Sure! Here’s a 100PB thumb drive.
*isolinear data crystal.
Hopefully the usb standard hasn’t updated too much.
USB-C PDcl2-𝕪ℙⓔʞɔɒds̷̬͑̉́̍̇̀̑̈́̇͊̄̊̑p̵̛̭̗̓̓̽̈́̿͋̂́̈́̎̔̔̋̓͑͜ä̸͚̥̼̼́͑̊̾̅̈́̌̈̎͡͝͡c̸͈͍͈͖̾͌̂̊̀͒͂̀̍́͝ḛ̵̪͔̭͖͔̯̑̔̓͗͜͝ͅ
Version 2.0 or 2.1?
Version 2.0.1a7-RC4
Its now been renamed to 2.3.1a7-RC4 and 2.3.1a7-RC4 has been renamed to 2.3.2a7-RC4
If its USBC its probably still backwards compatible.
Buger looking glob of DNA
In a thousand years from now, I honestly think 100PB is small for a thumb drive. I’ve seen such drastic increase in storage density in my lifetime that, while I don’t expect it, I wouldn’t be surprised if I see 100PB in single storage devices at some point in my lifetime.
I’m already dealing with PB-sized storage clusters at work, so the need for that k8nd of storage is already there, and necessity drives innovation.