• threeduck@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Trigger warning: the word tra*ma

    I like to think of myself as pretty supportive, but is there really any evidence that specifically reading the word “trauma” is traumatic? And if so, is the removal of the “U” really a solution to that?

    Because it seems like asterixing one letter is more of a performative measure to signify ones support for the overall cause rather than an actually means to reduce suffering.

    How close can the “U” be before it starts to upset someone?

    “Tra u ma”

    Uuuuuuuuuuuuu Tra ma Uuuuuuuuuuuuuu

    I don’t believe that someone who is affected by the word “trauma” would view the above examples with a complete non-reaction because the U is vaguely obfuscated.

    Like, we can agree that the asterix is just a display of consideration to someone, rather than an actually effective measure, right?

    • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s actually counterproductive! People who want to screen stuff about abuse from their internet experience can set up filters. Those filters are broken when you censor the relevant words!

      • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah but does that matter if using the asterisk helps those not the victim of abuse feel better about their day? They are the real victims 🤣

        • amio@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If the word triggers some symptom, then why would that same word, “hidden” by a trick that wouldn’t faze a six-year-old, be any less harmful?