Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Lol I didn’t quite get my math right, but it still involves imaginary numbers. Fun fact! Any 3D game you’ve played in the past probably quarter century doesn’t just use 1 dimension of imaginary numbers, but 3 to represent 3D rotation! Quaternions are difficult to visualize since it’s a 4-dimensional quantity but they’re perfect for representing rotation in 3D space without suffering from gimbal lock like rotation matrices.
Well let’s break it down:
Simple!
Wait, what happened in the second to last bullet point? You can’t convert a power like that when subtracting (you can when dividing).
It’s like you’d convert “2^4 - 2” into “2^(4-1)”, which gives two different results (14 vs 8).
For those curious, I threw 🥤^i - 🥤 = 3 into wolfram.
🥤 ≈ -2.97983 + 0.0388569 i… or 🥤 ≈ 0.27972 - 0.748461 i…
You’re right, idk what I was thinking there 😕
I think they’re saying no one can give the real answer to this… which is technically true because the answer is imaginary.
you forgot the ± when square rooting:
🍟 = ±i
this is because i × i = -1 and -i × -i = -1
Bah, yes I forgot about that
Don’t you mean 🍟 = i?
And just like that, I’m back to junior high grumbling about the concept of imaginary numbers.
Fuck you, y’all made up! 🤣
Lol I didn’t quite get my math right, but it still involves imaginary numbers. Fun fact! Any 3D game you’ve played in the past probably quarter century doesn’t just use 1 dimension of imaginary numbers, but 3 to represent 3D rotation! Quaternions are difficult to visualize since it’s a 4-dimensional quantity but they’re perfect for representing rotation in 3D space without suffering from gimbal lock like rotation matrices.