• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      113
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are a bunch of free channels on the internet that some TVs can just stream without a dedicated app. These channels are supported by ads like cable/whatever channels, but not locked behind a subscription. VLC is supporting whatever formats they use to allow (or make it easier; IDK) people to watch them if they want.

      The other part is that they’re working on web assembly to allow sites to use VLC as their embedded video player.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m so conflicted about web assembly. I’m a web developer and I think it’s going to be amazing eventually but 20% of me thinks it’s going to be a security nightmare and require a decade of fuck ups to reach its potential.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m mostly worried about how much less open this will make the web for simple local hacking. I often add small features to webapps I use by injecting code and hooking into their systems (when it’s not an app with open source, where I send a PR instead - and if I can work around issues I do contact the owners with a working fix).

          This will be much harder with WebAssembly. Sure, there’ll be decompilers in time - but in the time it takes me to change a small piece of behaviour in such cases, I can add multiple features in the current JS environment, even if the code is obfuscated.

          • aluminium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m more concerned that the web will get even slower and bloated. We are already seeing the first frameworks that ship a webassembly .NET runtime, Python runtime, JVM, … . I kinda fear that in 10 years when you visit a site you need to download runtime xyz in version abc for the 1000th time. All because some people or companies just can not be bothered to learn any new technology.

        • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          require a decade of fuck ups to reach its potential.

          That’s quicker than people, heck I’m going on my 3rd decade and still not at my potential. Or so I like to tell myself.

        • ares35@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          you don’t even need a player script; browsers today can play media on their own.

          and scripts with added features is a very crowded market.

    • Shin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      He shouldn’t have to, the point is read before commenting about a clickbait headline. If he has to spell it out that only furthers his point.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, he has no responsibility to explain it. But if he would like to help anyways, he could.