Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Then I’m not sure what you point was supposed to be. If lifesaving surgery is mutilation then mutilation isn’t inherently a bad thing and isn’t an argument against gender affirming surgery.
By definition it is mutilation. The difference is consent.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilation
Then removing a ruptured appendix is also mutilation by that logic.
Yeah… Because that’s what it means. I don’t know if your providing an example because you agree or you thought that was a gotcha.
Then I’m not sure what you point was supposed to be. If lifesaving surgery is mutilation then mutilation isn’t inherently a bad thing and isn’t an argument against gender affirming surgery.
I never made an argument for or against any surgery. My point, was consent. Please read the first response that I had made in this thread.