• Squeak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I just read it. I can’t even see a game mentioned. What are you going on about?

        Satire is usually based on real life…

          • Squeak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ok. But the article is satire. The reason Nintendo sued is obviously not to enshrine people’s name for game preservation… that’s the joke.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nintendo also didn’t sue every single person involved in video game preservation. Thatsthejoke.jpg

            The “community reaction” you’re referring to doesn’t exist. People by and large are saying “no surprise, they did it while the console was still on sale, and they tried to make money doing it”.

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                You were exactly the one I meant to reply to. You’re criticising what is clearly a joke as if it were a real position and inventing controversy with a scarecrow argument.