There are a couple of instances that are clearly misaligned with my values, but they’re very active, so a lot of the communities keep popping up in my feed. I’ve been blocking the communities, but it would be pretty cool if I could just block the entire instance. I know an instance can defederate from another instance. Is there a way for an individual user to do something similar, short of spinning up an entire instance myself?

    • dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Analogous to the existing community block functionality, users can also block instances. This means that all content from communities which are hosted there is hidden. Posts from users of blocked instances are still visible in other places.

      Well that’s disappointing.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ugh - that’s really frustrating especially since they must know this isn’t what everyone actually wants. Let us have personal defederation - it would solve the whole defederation controversy in one stroke. There would no longer be any reason for instances to make such huge decisions on behalf of all it’s users, and individuals can choose to disengage with toxic communities on their own

        • zarkony@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get why you would want that, but I think that would end up causing other weird issues. Like what happens when someone from that instance is in the middle of a comment chain? Would it cut off the thread there, or would there just be a comment missing?

          I’ll take the simple solution over no solution.

    • NightAuthor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is nice, but not quite the same. Blocks per app are useful, but it’s even nicer when you can have blocks per user. Like I want to block lemmynsfw.com on this account, but not on another account. Right now my solution is using 2 apps.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only posts though - not comments. Frankly i find that the posts from problem instances are rarely as bad as their comments

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not yet, someone requested this feature and I would like it to to block the NSFW porn instances. I do have NSFW enabled but I still see pictures of SFW girls in my feed from NSFW instances and I would like to just block that stuff from those adult only instances.

    I not for lemmy.world blocking or deferating instances in general. But this feature gives the user the choice to block instances while others can allow content from instsnces to flow into their feed if they wish.

    https://lemmy.world/post/1457532

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One day - social media will break up NSFW tags into actual useful warning tags - so we can mute porn without blocking movie spoilers or troubling news articles and shit like that

      • Cam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I only use FOSS apps. I am sure someday it will be added into Lemmy itself.

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s ok, you can say hexbear. They know they are annoying and everyone hates them.

    • Ithilwen@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use connect, and any posts from a user in a blocked instance still pops up with a message saying what instance they’re on and that it’s blocked, but I can click on it to reveal the comment.

      • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s probably the most straightforward implementation of instance-wide blocking for users. I like it.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, I’d like that.

          I don’t usually want to block entire instances, but when I do, it’s usually because of a few bad apples. If I can tell a conversation has some merit to it, I’ll want to read it, even if it’s from an instance worth a large amount of bad apples.

          So yeah, let me search for communities in blocked instances, reveal comments from posters in blocked instances, etc. In other words, let me opt in to seeing content I’ve blocked if I specifically request it

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the contrary, I’m super glad to find out I can block the posts of a community without generalizing about the quality of its users.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I dumb because I’m on Sync and you can filter entire communities? Seems like other clients could easily follow suit.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re using an app, both connect and sync for lemmy have instance filtering.

        The caveat is that it’s filtering, which is in-app only. But it works quite well in both.