Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
What? He’s finally starting to get his fill. I guess a thousand Israelis are worth about 35k Palestinians to old Joe. Or maybe he doesn’t give a fuck about Palestinians and he just wants your vote!
The irony is palpable.
What? He’s finally starting to get his fill. I guess a thousand Israelis are worth about 35k Palestinians to old Joe. Or maybe he doesn’t give a fuck about Palestinians and he just wants your vote!
Are you mad about a politician changing course because the voters wanted him to?
Do you think that someone who isn’t automatically against a genocide should be in charge?
It’d be nice, sure, but who’s going to fill that role in November? Realistic answers only, please
If your only two options are genocide, you don’t deserve to be a country anymore 🙊.
Not going to argue with that, but that isn’t an answer
It’s not a pretty answer.
Maybe not… but that isn’t up to us either. We gotta do what we can with what we have.
A country so proudly against tyranny with 3 guns per person:
“Oh sorry our hands are tied, I guess those brown children will have to be genocided.”
Ahh, yes, the “let’s solve murder with more murder” approach. It’s works flawlessly throughout human history.