Hello c/sublinks_support community,

I wanted to bring to your attention a concern I have regarding the Lemmy developers closing many of my issues as “not planned” without allowing the community to provide input. I am curious if there is a system in place for determining which issues are added to the roadmap and which are closed as not planned.

If the sublinks developers follow transparent rules for issue prioritization and consider some of my suggestions for the roadmap, I am willing to become more involved in the project development. While it has been some time since college when I last programmed in Java, I am prepared to refresh my skills and get up to speed with Spring Boot.

You can find the list of my reported issues on GitHub for Lemmy here:

  • Lemmy Backend Issues: Link
  • Lemmy UI Issues: Link

I look forward to understanding more about the process and potentially contributing further to the project. Thank you for your attention.

  • CTDummy@lemm.eeEnglish
    2·
    4 months ago

    consider some of my suggestions for the roadmap, I am willing to become more involved in the project development. While it has been some time since college when I last programmed

    How about you contribute to the project first, then maybe the devs may listen your suggestions due to you being a contributor. Seems more realistic and reasonable than “if the devs do what I want, then I’ll learn the skills required to help their project in the future, maybe”.