• naticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    You know what’s sad? The fact we’re to a point where it’s actually a very very good idea to get a DNA test on the baby before taking them home. Not for infidelity, but in case the baby was swapped, both by accident or maliciously.

    • mob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m trying hard to find a fact that its getting worse, but seems like the last research done on the temporary/permanently swapped babies was 1998, and the handling of babies has improved greatly since then.

      Have you read something that makes it sound worse?

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Perhaps naticus is paranoid. I’ve birthed three children and remember before each baby leaves my sight, nurses give a matching scannable ID wristband to mother and baby.

      • naticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve just heard too many stories about it happening. Does that mean it’s really happening? Not sure, but I’ve also not looked into confirmed reports, and there’s a lot of controls put into place for a reason. I just usually err on the side of caution when it comes to simple human error as well as the very real threat of human trafficking.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I didn’t let my baby out of my sight the entire time my wife was recovering in the hospital. Absolutely not risking a swap or kidnapping, regardless of how likely or unlikely it is. I’d recommend everyone do that if it’s feasible to have someone always watching the baby during cleaning and testing.