Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
I need to make it a priority to give logseq a try. I moved from Joplin to obsidian.md a couple years ago, because i realized an open data format (plaintext markdown files) was more important to me than an open source app (because I can still easily query and manipulate my data with open source CLI tools). I think at this point if I can replicate about 75% of my obsidian workflow in logseq, I’ll make the jump and adapt my workflows to logseq’s strengths and capabiities.
I think both are equally great and it’s more about taste.
Logseq is an outliner, so basically everything is written in bullet points. For my type of thinking, that’s great.
Obsidian is more about longer notes.
You can archive both with extensions, so it’s about you what you prefer.
Logseq. Linear To-Do-lists aren’t for me, and in Logseq, I can do it organically
I need to make it a priority to give logseq a try. I moved from Joplin to obsidian.md a couple years ago, because i realized an open data format (plaintext markdown files) was more important to me than an open source app (because I can still easily query and manipulate my data with open source CLI tools). I think at this point if I can replicate about 75% of my obsidian workflow in logseq, I’ll make the jump and adapt my workflows to logseq’s strengths and capabiities.
I think both are equally great and it’s more about taste.
Logseq is an outliner, so basically everything is written in bullet points. For my type of thinking, that’s great. Obsidian is more about longer notes.
You can archive both with extensions, so it’s about you what you prefer.