Warning: Some posts on this platform may contain adult material intended for mature audiences only. Viewer discretion is advised. By clicking ‘Continue’, you confirm that you are 18 years or older and consent to viewing explicit content.
Our understanding of the brain is still very much in an infantile state, but we are starting to understand how disorders look on brain scans. We could test people based on their reaction to situations that would come up in corruption cases.
I’ve filled out hours of test for entry level positions that never called me back. Anyone looking to get into management or politics could be tested in many ways. We choose not to develop testing for these positions.
And how do we decide through those tests who is right to lead? For example how do we ensure that these tests don’t just filter out women or POC or LGBT or people who are going to push too hard to help the people.
By testing. The only way to find out if a test is performing well is to look at the results. I wouldn’t know how to test for these things as I am neuro divergent and don’t value physical processions almost at all. I’m pretty much un-bribable, so I could never develop a test for if someone is susceptible to it. I know there was a study that found normal people feel great pride winning a game of monopoly, even when they know the game is rigged in their favor. I can’t imagine that being fun as a base line of who I am. Are there enough people out there who are immune to temptation in the way I am? No idea. But maybe we could work on some tests to find out.
Well, like with anything else, we need a test.
Our understanding of the brain is still very much in an infantile state, but we are starting to understand how disorders look on brain scans. We could test people based on their reaction to situations that would come up in corruption cases.
I’ve filled out hours of test for entry level positions that never called me back. Anyone looking to get into management or politics could be tested in many ways. We choose not to develop testing for these positions.
And how do we decide through those tests who is right to lead? For example how do we ensure that these tests don’t just filter out women or POC or LGBT or people who are going to push too hard to help the people.
By testing. The only way to find out if a test is performing well is to look at the results. I wouldn’t know how to test for these things as I am neuro divergent and don’t value physical processions almost at all. I’m pretty much un-bribable, so I could never develop a test for if someone is susceptible to it. I know there was a study that found normal people feel great pride winning a game of monopoly, even when they know the game is rigged in their favor. I can’t imagine that being fun as a base line of who I am. Are there enough people out there who are immune to temptation in the way I am? No idea. But maybe we could work on some tests to find out.