• Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      When you do that on someone else’s land?

      We call that colonialism and the people who’s land it was generally aren’t too thrilled

    • beardown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes? Especially if the territory of that state is forcibly taken away from others who are living on it

      Creating the United States was similarly terrible as it involved the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Native Americans. Same with Australia. Same with South Africa. Same with Rhodesia.

      Forcibly taking someone’s home and cleansing an area of an ethnicity is certainly regarded as one of the worst actions a group of people can do. And rightly so

      • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Of course, the way Israel was created was not ideal. I do not agree that Israel should have forced people out.

        Just like many Arab countries should not have forced Jews out.

        But unfortunately, it’s not very feasible to return it to the previous state now…

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          A lot of countries have a right of return. It works just fine. They may not be able to get the family farm back, but we can’t win everything.

              • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                So far the international court has not decided on the genocide case, so it’s incorrect to accuse them of genocide now.

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  South Africa has accused them of genocide. You’re saying South Africa, a former apartheid regime that has since been liberated, is incorrect to do so? What gives you the authority to judge them so? Obviously it isn’t because you’ve read their filings with the International Court of Justice

                  • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Exactly, nothing gives me the authority to judge it. Same applies to you. As long as final decision is not made, we cannot accuse them of genocide.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The UN definition is public knowledge. It’s not like it’s a secret we have to wait for the clerics to decipher. What they’re doing meets the definition.

                  • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Not necessarily, proving the intention is the key to genocide accusations and it’s quite tough to prove.